Romans 9:21
Translation Comparison (18 available)
Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?
Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?
Or has not the potter the right to make out of one part of his earth a vessel for honour, and out of another a vessel for shame?
Or has not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honour, and another to dishonour?
Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
What if God (Elohim), willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering vessels of wrath fitted unto destruction:
Doesn't a potter have the right to use the same batch of clay to make both a decorative bowl and an everyday pot?
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Does the potter not have authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honor and one to dishonor?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
When a potter makes jars out of clay, doesn’t he have a right to use the same lump of clay to make one jar for decoration and another to throw garbage into?
Hath not the potter power over the clay of the same lump to make one vessel to honor, and another to dishonor?
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
hath not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make the one vessel to honour, and the one to dishonour?